Spring/Summer 2007

BUCKEYE BULLETIN

Eric Duffy, Editor
4501 N. 4th Street
Columbus, OH 43224
eduffy@pobox.com
www.nfbohio.org
1-800-396-NFBO

Sylvia Cooley
Production Editor
Barbara Pierce
President
237 Oak Street
Oberlin, OH 44074
bbpierce@pobox.com
(440) 775-2216

The National Federation of the Blind of Ohio is a 501 (c) 3 consumer organization comprised of blind and sighted people committed to changing what it means to be blind. Though blindness is still all too often a tragedy to those who face it, we know from our personal experience that with training and opportunity it can be reduced to the level of a physical nuisance. We work to see that blind people receive the services and training to which they are entitled and that parents of blind children receive the advice and support they need to help their youngsters grow up to be happy, productive adults. We believe that first-class citizenship means that people have both rights and responsibilities, and we are determined to see that blind people become first-class citizens of these United States, enjoying their rights and fulfilling their responsibilities. The most serious problems we face have less to do with our lack of vision than with discrimination based on the public’s ignorance and misinformation about blindness. Join us in educating Ohioans about the abilities and aspirations of Ohio’s blind citizens.
The NFB of Ohio has twelve local chapters around the state, a chapter for at-large members, and special divisions for diabetics, merchants, students, seniors, and parents of blind children. This quarterly newsletter is produced in large print and on cassette. To receive more information about the National Federation of the Blind of Ohio, to make address changes for the newsletter, or to be added to the mailing list, call (800) 396-6326.

Table of Contents

From the President’s Desk
by Barbara Pierce

Schools for the Deaf and Blind Likely to Be Combined
by Eric Duffy

BLIND, Inc., a Life-Changing Experience
by Sarah Leon

Saving Money for NEWSLINE
by David Meyer

Ohio Convention Just Around the Corner
by Mary Pool

Ohio Mentoring Project
by Deborah Kendrick

Federationists Busy in Congress and State Capital
by Eric Duffy

More than Meets the Eyes and Ears, Lecturer Speaks about Abilities of the Visually Impaired
by Karen Brosz

2007 NFB of Ohio Committee Assignments
by Barbara Pierce

Buckeye Briefs

Activities Calendar

From the President’s Desk
by Barbara Pierce

March 31 I was in Minneapolis, keynoting a daylong Federation membership seminar. The folks who invited me were no doubt hoping that I would give them creative new suggestions about how to attract energetic, committed new members who want nothing more than to work hard doing the boring jobs that no one likes doing, who like nothing better than selling candy bars in the cold and rain, and who are never argumentative or opinionated. If this was truly their expectation, they were disappointed because I do not know how to find and attract such folks. Building membership is slow and painstaking work. You have to figure out where blind people are and what they are interested in. Not everyone is cut out to be an NFB member. Those who expect the world to revolve around them or who are looking only for a social group will never feel at home in most NFB chapters.
Yet pure self-interest has brought many of our most active members and leaders into the organization: scholarships, workshops and seminars for families of blind children, the need for advocacy in a dispute with an agency or employer, financial or physical help getting to meetings or conventions, or a friendly voice and good advice about coping with vision loss. All of these needs are legitimate reasons for being attracted initially to the Federation, and we must be, not just willing, but eager and cheerful when meeting such needs. I find when dealing with such folks that it helps to remember times when I felt at sea or helpless coping with blindness. Somehow it is easier to make the contacts and throw out the lifelines when I recall how lonely and frightening it can be out there alone or with only the support of friends and family who have no idea how to help.
Finding and recruiting members is an art, not a science. I have said that the NFB cannot be all things to all people and that it is important to recognize when the fit is not right. But at the same time all too often we think and act too narrowly. I have heard people say with a straight face that they already know all the blind people in their entire city or county and that none of them would make good members. Using the statistic that blind people comprise one half of 1 percent of the general population, in my town of 10,000 I should be able to find fifty blind people—probably more since we have a large retirement complex within the city limits. Yet I know fewer than ten, perhaps fewer than five of these folks. We can always find blind people if we will take the time and trouble to look for them. Here are some suggestions of how to do it:

* Get a supply of NFB of Ohio brochures or the “What Is the National Federation of the Blind?” brochures, and stamp a chapter contact address and phone number on them. Then take a handful to optometrists, ophthalmologists, relevant social service offices, senior centers, retirement facilities, public libraries, and churches.
* Hand-carry state and national scholarship forms to disabled student services offices at area postsecondary institutions and high school guidance counselors. * Take Braille Readers Are Leaders forms to the director of special education in your school district.
* Use October (Meet the Blind Month) to staff a table in a public place and pass out NFB-NEWSLINE® information, Talking Book library applications, the Voice of the Diabetic, and other NFB and general blindness literature.
* Identify physicians with a number of diabetic patients, and keep them supplied with issues of the Voice of the Diabetic.
* Use Braille Literacy Week (the week beginning on Louis Braille’s birthday, January 4) for high-profile activities in libraries, scout troops, or schools that will get newspaper coverage.
* Conduct a technology fair and publicize it to the community, inviting people losing vision to come and see what is available.

Obviously you can’t do all of these things, but you can decide on several. Spread the work around the chapter, and be sure to collect the names and phone numbers of every blind person or person losing vision that you come across. It is always a good idea to spread the chapter’s name and a contact number around, but if you want to get new members, you must contact them.
As you identify potential members, don’t be afraid to think outside the box of our traditional organizational structures. College students might meet on campus with one or two chapter members present to supply information and answer questions. Residents of a retirement facility might form a support group led or mentored by the chapter. Young members of the chapter might be encouraged to get together regularly for social outings. Young families would enjoy doing kid-centered activities together. The chapter can sponsor all these efforts and pull folks together periodically for business meetings and to plan projects. Don’t be afraid to organize more than one chapter in a large geographical area. If transportation or work schedules or conflicting personal responsibilities make it impossible for some people to get to chapter meetings, consider whether a second chapter might be the answer. The point is to design meetings and programs that everyone will find interesting and convenient to get to.
Now the slow work of cultivation begins. Assign members to follow through with the folks with whom they seem to have something in common: parents of blind children, diabetics, macular degeneration, college students, etc. The object is to maintain contact and gentle pressure to attend the next meeting. Do not give up when the person does not show. Be sure to get the names and addresses of anyone who wishes to receive the state newsletter and the Braille Monitor to me, and don’t forget to tell me which publication they want and what format they prefer. The object is to make friends and guide the newcomer into an understanding of what we do and how we live our lives.
It helps when chapter meetings are busy and interesting and when people will take the time to explain to newcomers what is going on. When activities attract new members, they help to energize the existing membership as well. When members are asked to answer the questions of new members, they will do a better job of reading our literature and discussing ideas. That is healthy for everyone.
You should always work to get as many members as possible to state board meetings, state conventions, and the national convention. These events help people to understand what we are accomplishing across the state and country. Recruiting new members is more like searching for gold than picking apples. Identifying gold on the ground or in a stream takes practice, and the true nuggets are few and far between. On second thought, perhaps recruiting members is more like searching for shells buried in the sand. They come in great variety and degrees of damage, but an eager seeker can usually find intriguing or attractive specimens in even a short walk along the beach. Recruiting new members is essential work if our chapters are to remain or become healthy. Every chapter in this affiliate could benefit from an ambitious membership program. But remember that one of the greatest benefits of such an effort is the vitality that it will bring to the existing chapter and its current members. And when chapter members are committed and excited, new members will be attracted like iron filings to a magnet.
In some ways I have kept the best news for last in this column. All the things that I have said about recruiting new members are true, and membership development is a lot of work. But we have a secret weapon in this effort. The catch is that often our own members do not recognize that the tool is in our hands. Even when we do realize this fact, we often use it like a bludgeon rather than the enticement that it actually is. I am speaking of the philosophy of hope and possibility that is the bedrock of the Federation.
Do you remember the story in the Book of Acts in the New Testament in which Peter and John are approaching the temple? They come upon a man who has been lame from birth. He asks them for alms, but the two disciples have no cash to give. Peter looks with compassion on the helpless beggar and says, “Gold and silver have I none, but what I have, I give you. Rise up and walk.”
Every time we speak with a blind person who has never met the Federation philosophy, we are like Peter and John. We don’t have professional services or funds for technology to offer the newly blind person, but we can offer information, experience, optimism, and high expectations for the future. In effect we are offering an invitation to rise up and walk forward with a friend and guide who knows the way and who can avoid the pitfalls. We can provide sympathetic understanding without pity and our own dreams of what we can achieve together.
Not everyone has the courage to take this gift, and very few dare to believe in it when they first hear what we say. That is why we must be subtle and patient and teach by example rather than preaching. Learning to live what we believe and to teach slowly is the real challenge of membership building, but mastering these skills provides deep satisfaction and builds a powerful organization that truly will change what it means to be blind.
Very few if any of us are far enough along in this journey toward equality to be expert in nurturing new members into active membership in the Federation family without ever making a misstep or a mistake. We are all learning and growing, which is why we so often find ourselves needing each other’s help. My private opinion is that Peter was not all that confident of what was going to happen when he issued the invitation to the lame man to rise up and walk. I can imagine his astonishment and delight when the beggar took him at his word, stood up, and began to dance. I can imagine Peter’s excitement because I have experienced it myself when my faltering efforts to give the Federation to someone have resulted in reviving hope and new life for a blind person who had been despairing. I invite every member and chapter to discover this thrill for yourself.

Schools for the Blind and Deaf Likely to Be Combined
by Eric Duffy

When I first matriculated to the Ohio State School for the Blind (OSSB) in the early 1970’s the school was almost filled to capacity. With the passage of Public Law 94-142 (now known as the Individuals with Disabilities Education act, IDEA), more students than ever before began to receive an education in the local school district.
By the late 70’s discussions about the need for residential schools for the blind became quite intense. In the early 80’s the Michigan School for the Blind actually closed down. Even while at OSSB many of my friends and I recognized that OSSB could share the Michigan school’s fate.
We also knew that there was a real possibility that the schools for the deaf and blind could be combined. I had no reason to give either of these possibilities much thought until about a year ago, when Shelbi Johnson contacted me to say that she had heard that the two schools were going to be combined. I said that I had not heard anything about this and that legislative action would have to take place before this could happen. I did what I could to determine the truth about the situation and was assured that there was no plan to combine the schools. That was the last time I thought about the matter until I read the following article:

Schools for Deaf, Blind May Share New Campus
by Simone Sebastian
The Columbus Dispatch
Thursday, February 1, 2007

Deaf students and blind ones will share a campus if state and school officials can work out a $40 million plan to create a modern complex for the Ohio State School for the Blind and the Ohio School for the Deaf.
Preliminary plans call for the combined campus to be built on the School for the Deaf's 138-acre property at 500 Morse Road. The current home of the School for the Blind, at 5220 N. High Street, would be abandoned and could be made available for private development. The combination would allow the schools to replace older buildings with modern ones and share costs such as custodial, food and health services, but officials stressed that their educational programs would remain distinct.
"Both schools will retain their identities," School for the Deaf Superintendent Edward E. Corbett Jr. said through an interpreter. He is deaf.
"There really will be no change" for students, he said, because deaf and blind students have different needs. With deafness they deal with communication. With blindness they deal with mobility.... It's like mixing oranges and apples."
School officials hope to be ready to ask the state legislature for money next spring or summer, with a goal of completing the project by 2012. The state-run schools, which serve students across Ohio, operate on adjacent campuses separated by trees and a ravine at the corner of Morse Road and N. High Street. The School for the Deaf has 142 students. The School for the Blind has 128. The state appropriated $4 million for the schools to begin planning the consolidation under the oversight of the Ohio School Facilities Commission, an independent state agency. The commission is collecting bids from architectural firms to design the new campus. Over the next year the commission, architects, and school officials will determine what would need to be built. If the timeline continues as planned, construction could begin next summer, said Lou Mazzoli, superintendent of the School for the Blind. It is unclear how extensive the merger would be. The schools' classrooms would remain distinct, but officials are uncertain whether they would share auditoriums, cafeterias, dormitories, and other larger spaces. Whether the consolidation would affect jobs also remains to be seen, Mazzoli said. "We're going to have to evaluate that," he said. "It's not going to happen tomorrow." Mazzoli stressed that the plan is not definite and said it's possible that the blind school's campus would be used instead of the deaf school's. It's unlikely the schools would move to another site, he said. "The site that comes up the most often is the front part of the property of the Ohio School for the Deaf," he said. "But we're taking a look at all factors." The state owns both properties. The School for the Blind is in a good location for developers because of other projects in the area, said Mike Simpson, a commercial broker with NAI Ohio Equities. The Casto development company is renovating Graceland Shopping Center, which is across High Street from the school. The city is working on plans to rebuild the Northland Mall area on Morse Road, just east of the campus. However, the buildings on the School for the Blind's campus, which date from the 1950s, could have limited potential. Both schools have been struggling with deteriorating infrastructure, old electrical systems, and collapsing sewer lines. "It's a single-use building," Simpson said. "That's always a challenge when it comes to selling because it narrows the prospect list. Charter schools could be candidates for a property like that." Mazzoli said it's too early to guess what would happen to the School for the Blind campus if the project moves forward as expected. Students in both schools would benefit from technology improvements at the new campus, administrators said.
Administrators said they hope the combined campus would provide more opportunities for the students to interact. Currently the blind students' marching band performs at the deaf students' football games.

Barbara Pierce and I were then contacted by a reporter from the Columbus Dispatch in mid-March. Although this subject has received considerable press coverage, we will reprint one final article:

Campus for Deaf, Blind Opposed Alumni Fear Social,
Safety Issues if State Schools Share Space
Monday, March 19, 2007
Simone Sebastian
The Columbus Dispatch

Alumni are fighting a plan to create a single campus for the state schools for the deaf and the blind, saying mingling their student bodies will create safety and social problems. They fear that students’ inability to communicate could lead to teasing and bullying if the Ohio State School for the Blind and Ohio School for the Deaf share facilities such as a gym and cafeteria. Forcing the students to interact will destroy the deaf school’s culture, said Richard Huebner, president of its alumni association. "We will start a petition, rally, and protest," Huebner said through an interpreter. "We’ll fight this to the bitter end to keep them separate."
Some alumni of the blind school fear that deaf students will take advantage of their blind peers if the campuses are combined. Deaf students might beat up blind students because they can’t see their abuser, said Doug Emerson, recording secretary for the blind school’s alumni association. But he said the blind alumni won’t impede the project.
"It is a done deal. It would be a moot point to go against it," Emerson said. "It does make good economic sense to do this."
The state-run schools’ campuses are separated by a ravine near the intersection of High Street and Morse Road. The state has appropriated $4 million to begin planning a consolidation of their campuses on the School for the Deaf’s 130-acre property to save money on operating costs. Their educational programs would remain separate.
If the project goes as planned, it will cost about $40 million and will be completed by 2012, officials have said. Officials from both the blind and deaf schools said they haven’t decided how much their students will interact but said that they will prevent violence. Officials won’t decide until June, at the earliest, whether the schools will share a gym, cafeteria, and other common areas, said Eric Algoe, chief operating officer for both schools. Members of the deaf-alumni association fear that merging the campuses will compromise deaf students’ self-esteem and conviction that deafness is not a handicap." I don’t feel I have a disability. Many deaf people don’t," Huebner said. "If you add another handicap (at the school) ... they’ll have no identity, no self-esteem."
That’s not an issue for the blind, said Barbara Pierce, president of the National Federation of the Blind’s Ohio division. "There’s a deaf culture in a way that there’s not a blindness culture," she said. Harlan Lane, a professor and author on deaf culture from Northeastern University in Boston, said government institutions started separating deaf people and blind people in the nineteenth century because of the stark differences in their needs. But economic constraints have reversed that trend. Now about twelve schools in the United States teach blind students and deaf students on the same campus, school officials said. Lane said that is an affront to deaf culture. "Their deaf world has its own customs, own values," he said. "They don’t see it as a disability, so to put them with a group that does see themselves as having a disability ... it cuts very deep."
School administrators say the plan makes economic sense. Buildings at both schools are deteriorating, they said, and the project will construct new ones and include state-of-the-art technology. The combined campus also will allow officials to merge services such as maintenance, food and custodians.
"That is a considerable cost savings to the state," deaf-school Superintendent Edward E. Corbett Jr. said through an interpreter. He is deaf. "Our buildings are not conducive to good teaching," he said. "The new school building will afford us good planning and help us achieve the school we want for the future of our students." Community meetings about the project will be held across the state, beginning with one today in Columbus. That meeting will be held at the Ohio School for the Deaf from 7 to 8:30 p.m.

As President of the National Federation of the Blind of Ohio, Barbara Pierce was invited to serve on an advisory council for this project. For a variety of reasons she asked me to serve in her place. I agreed, and Barbara contacted Eric Algoe to discuss the change in representatives. Mr. Algoe was quite agreeable, and although I have not yet met him, our email exchanges have been both pleasant and productive. Here is one such exchange:
Hello Eric, I understand that some preliminary meetings have already taken place on this subject and that a meeting or two are even scheduled over the next couple of weeks. I want to be sure that I will have the opportunity to provide meaningful service on an advisory council. I certainly do not want my involvement to be mere window dressing.
What can you tell me about the meetings that have already taken place and that are scheduled to happen before the council meets for the first time? What decisions have already been made, and are they binding? Cordially,
Eric

The meetings that we have had to date involved current students, staff, alumni, administrators from the schools, and the Ohio School Facilities Commission, about 60 people all told. The purpose of these meetings has been to determine a Program of Requirements (POR), which is just a list of the types of spaces and associated square footage of each. I suspect the end result of these meetings (the final POR) will be hard to change later on, but not impossible.
We are going to see a first draft of the POR on Monday, so we are all on pins and needles right now. We then have another meeting on Wednesday with the group I described above to respond and adjust that first draft. A fourth meeting is scheduled for April 23rd to try to finalize the POR, and we are scheduled to turn it over to the architects on May 4th. Keep in mind that the POR says nothing about how we use the spaces they give us or where they should be located--neither the site nor the relationship to each other. We still have all that to figure out.
I plan to put something together for the advisory council this weekend and send them a copy of that first draft POR. At the first meeting I hope to have the architects give you a presentation of their vision and take your questions.
We can't afford to have anyone involved as just window dressing. We need everyone's honest and heartfelt input to make sure we give the kids the best possible school. I'm just trying to balance the time needed of the advisory council as some of the members are from out of state. Would you like to attend one of our planning committee meetings that I mentioned above? The next one is April 4th from 8:30 AM to 3:00 PM in the gymnasium of the Ohio School for the Deaf.
Eric

Although I am glad we have been invited to the table, I feel like a dinner guest who was invited as an afterthought. I believe OSSB Superintendent Louis Mazzoli should have invited the organized blind to the table before the dinner bell sounded. We should have been a part of the discussions long before the first story ran in the media. Nonetheless we now have a seat at the table, and I plan to make the best of it for the organization.
In a public meeting Dr. Mazzoli explained that the plan to combine the schools was not put forward by either administration. He said that the state controlling board told both superintendents that it was tired of both schools nickeling and diming the state to death by asking for money for repairs and improvements to each school, and that each superintendent should come to the board to request money for new facilities. He said that near the end of the Taft administration the notion of combining the schools took on a life of its own when a Taft official said there would be one budget and one school.
Knowing the ways of politics and government, this is not hard to believe. We in the National Federation of the Blind, however, are purists, and we are not at all excited about combining the two schools in any way. This does not mean that we are going to oppose this effort at this point. It does mean that we are going to work to make the best lemonade out of the lemons that have been placed before us. Let no one with any interest in or connection to the blindness field make the mistake of believing that we have weakened our resolve. Our resources, strengths, and convictions have not diminished. Our fighting skills are still as sharp as they have ever been. Some may be tempted to believe that we were caught off guard and that by the time we discovered the plan we were unable to mount a good fight. Nothing could be further from the truth. In this case we have made the decision not to fight. That does not mean that we will make the same decision should our library services or rehabilitation services come under threat.
I will conclude this article with some interesting facts about the Ohio State School for the Blind. In 1837 the state purchased a large house on Parsons Avenue to begin educating blind students. In 1838 the first school was built. This school housed sixty students.
In 1867 the second school was built. Once again the school was built on Parsons Avenue. This school housed 425 students. This is what many now refer to as the old school. The school now located at 5220 North High Street was built in 1953. The gymnasium was not added until after the school was occupied. The swimming pool was built in the 1970’s.
Although I have been to the Parsons Avenue location, I have never really thought of it as a school for anything other than historical purposes. Paul Dressell for one has been a student at both schools. It is quite possible that he will see a third Ohio State School for the Blind during his lifetime.

BLIND Inc., a Life-Changing Experience
by Sarah Leon

Editor’s Note: Sarah Leon is a high school senior who delivered a presentation about her experiences with Bureau of Services for the Visually Impaired (BSVI) and BLIND, Inc., at our state convention in November. Everyone including the BSVI director was impressed with her presentation. We asked her to put her experiences on paper. Here is what she has to say:

The airplane began to creep down the runway. I sat rigidly, gazing out the window and hoping for a safe flight. Little did I realize that I was about to embark on one of the most exciting episodes of my life.
My story really begins long before this, on a night in March when many events were set in motion. My mom spent that night sleeplessly tossing and turning, worrying about my future. I was a junior in high school and was just beginning to look into possible colleges, yet I was utterly unprepared for any college experience. When, and where, and how could I find the skills I needed? At last the idea of a school for the blind occurred to her. The next morning she asked me what I would think of attending a school for the blind. This was not a new topic of discussion between us; I knew that I was limited in many ways. Never having learned even to cross an intersection, I was totally inadequate in travel, and I had never really worked with computers. I quickly decided that a school for the blind could be the answer I was looking for. Since I needed blindness skills only, and since my training could not interfere with my high school education, I had to find a summer program which concentrated solely on blindness training. Mom suggested that we look into some NFB centers that she had heard of, for we could be sure of finding people there who shared our philosophy of blindness and who would give me the right kind of training. To our delight, we discovered that all three centers had the type of program we wanted. Barbara Pierce has always been a source of wisdom for me on all issues related to blindness, so I called her to ask her advice about which center I should choose. After assuring me that training was a wonderful idea, she said that all three of the centers were fantastic and that I should call them for information and make my own choice. This I did, contacting all of the centers’ directors and finding out as much as I could about the programs. While all of them sounded very interesting, BLIND, Inc.’s College Prep/Life Skills class attracted my attention. Since college preparation was my main purpose in seeking training, I decided that BLIND, Inc., was ideally suited to meet my needs.
When I called BLIND, Inc., to ask them for application information, they suggested that I contact the Bureau of Services for the Visually Impaired of Ohio (BSVI) about funding for the program. They encouraged me to apply to the center in the meantime, saying that I could let them know about the funding later.
While I appreciated their kind advice, I was wary of becoming involved with an agency that I knew nothing about. Once more I called Mrs. Pierce for her advice. She soon explained to me the purpose of BSVI—to assist blind people to gain employment—its buy-Ohio policy, my right to make an informed choice about services and service providers, and my need to be approved for services. She also prepared me for the length and difficulty of the undertaking, especially if we had to appeal an unfavorable decision.
Armed with this new information, I called BSVI and asked to speak with a counselor. The counselor listened as I described my needs and desires and then set an appointment when we could discuss these things in person. In the interval I applied and was accepted to BLIND, Inc. Nothing remained now except to learn whether BSVI would fund my training. When the day of the appointment arrived, my parents went with me to the meeting. The counselor began by asking the usual questions—how had I been educated, what was my level of blindness skills, and what were my goals and desires in coming to BSVI? She explained that any services I received would have to be part of an IPE (an Individualized Plan for Employment). I would have to set a vocational goal and show how blindness training fit with that goal before I could receive any funding. Also, because of BSVI’s Buy-Ohio policy, I would have to demonstrate that BLIND, Inc., could help me reach my vocational goal in ways that no in-state program could match.
Few sixteen-year-olds really know what they want to do with their life, and I was no exception. I was strongly opposed to being channeled into a vocation too early, instead of allowing events and college experience to guide me naturally into the right form of employment. Yet I needed the training, so I agreed to try to designate a possible future career. My counselor then told me that I had been approved for services and assured me that she would do everything in her power to help me get funding for training. She also asked me to compile a document listing my reasons for choosing BLIND, Inc., instead of an Ohio program such as that conducted by the Cleveland Sight Center (CSC).
Returning home, we immediately put together the required document; explaining that BLIND, Inc., could give me sleepshade training, blind instructors as role models, apartment-living experience, and preparation for interacting with college professors and fellow students. After waiting a couple of weeks without any response from my counselor, we finally contacted her for feedback. To our dismay we learned that what we had sent was insufficient. She now asked us to give her a point-by-point comparison of BLIND, Inc.’s program with an Ohio program like the CSC’s new summer program. Excitedly she described this new program and urged us to research it in detail.
I was somewhat shaken, but I began at once to call the directors of both centers, collecting as much information as I could. Each phone call only confirmed more clearly my first conclusion: the CSC program could not meet my training needs. We laid this out in a letter, especially stressing the sleepshade training. This type of training allows students to learn alternative blindness techniques which make it possible for them to function independently and safely, regardless of further vision loss. This training is also helpful when a student has just enough vision to be dangerous when attempting to use it for traveling. I fall into both these categories. The director of CSC’s summer program told me that he did not believe in sleepshades. Furthermore, only three of CSC’s thirteen instructors are blind, and I was told that a travel instructor must be sighted to tell me how to move in my environment. At BLIND, Inc., seven of the nine instructors, including the travel instructor, are blind. Even in areas such as recreation and apartment life I found that BLIND, Inc.’s program was challenging and encouraged total independence, while CSC’s was unexciting and encouraged reliance on semi-functional vision.
Shortly after I sent this letter, BLIND, Inc., contacted me to tell me that they had to know within two weeks whether I could come that summer. Not being able to reach my counselor, I was referred to her supervisor, to whom I explained the new urgency of my situation. The supervisor told me that we would have to write an IPE and provide a cost analysis of the two programs before anything else could be done. This was alarming, since writing an IPE can take weeks, but I sent through the cost analysis immediately. I noticed that BLIND, Inc.’s eight-week program cost two hundred dollars less than CSC’s six-week program. Since my counselor had suggested BSVI might cover the equivalent of an Ohio program in funding BLIND, Inc., this was highly encouraging.
Two days later my counselor called me. Excitedly she told me that I had been approved for 100% funding of the BLIND, Inc., program, and she did not mention the IPE. Gratefully I thanked her for the wonderful news, thrilled that BSVI had come through with the funding just in time.
One month later, after much happy anticipation and preparation, I was saying good bye to my parents and boarding a Minneapolis-bound plane. I had not flown since I was a little girl, and because of my close friendships with my siblings, I had never spent even one night without someone from my family. Perhaps these were the causes of my nervousness as I sat looking out the tiny window. Yet we landed in Minneapolis without the slightest incident. After sitting in the gate for a long time, waiting for someone from BLIND, Inc., to come and get me, I at last called the center to find out where my escort was. They told me that someone was waiting for me at baggage claim. After another long wait I secured one of the airline staff to accompany me downstairs. There I met Dick Davis, the assistant director of BLIND, Inc., who drove me to the center and gave me what felt like a whirlwind tour of its lower floor. Then he took me to my apartment, giving me a long, terribly confusing explanation of the route the students took to school. Not until he had dropped me off at my apartment did I begin to feel at home, as I unpacked and made friends with my roommate.
My impressions during those first few days are a whirl of activity and directions, most of which I did not comprehend. Minneapolis was like a vast labyrinth of streets, names, and routes. The buses seemed terrible to me. It was like a strange game where I had to leap on and off at exactly the right instant or be sucked into the heart of the labyrinth.
Still, from the first day that I began my training, I fell in love with the center. It is difficult to say what caused me to feel this way. Perhaps it was the practical new skills I was learning daily, which were revolutionizing my ability, or perhaps it was the novelty and challenge, yet I found myself enjoying the experience immensely. Intermingled with this enjoyment was the incredible amount of work that I was doing. I had not realized just how much I didn’t know until I arrived at the center, and I wanted to learn as much as I could in the short time I had. When the staff saw my hunger to learn, they pushed me at a faster pace, doing everything in their power to assist me. Their efforts were undoubtedly what allowed me to accomplish as much as I did.
My instructors were willing to sacrifice even their own personal time to give me the training I needed. For instance, the shop instructor stayed for hours overtime, helping me to finish a beautiful Norwegian-style bookcase. On another occasion, my last day at the center, I reminded my computer instructor that I had not learned how to do email, and I had only an hour and a half left. He immediately dropped what he was doing, leaving his break early, and taught me how to work my email account. The staff’s impact went far beyond teaching me skills, however. They completely changed my ideas of independence and blindness. Before coming to the center, I had unconsciously set limits for my independence, but the daily exposure to blind instructors who lived truly independently shattered those limits, an experience that I could never have gotten from sighted instructors. Sometimes it was the little things, like watching the guys run down the stairs, that affected me most. They inspired me to learn to live independently as well, and I eagerly accepted the challenge.
My training was not free of difficulties. One day, after I had spent two miserable hours wandering around on what should have been a one-hour assignment, I shared my frustrations with my travel instructor. To my shock, he replied, “Well, that’s wonderful!” As I stared at him in disbelief, he explained, “I like all my students to have at least half a dozen similar experiences before they graduate. Look at what happened; you got lost, but you used your knowledge and creativity to get unlost. That’s really valuable.” From this I realized that part of BLIND, Inc.’s training philosophy was that experience, even if it is failure, is the best teacher for life.
Interspersed with the work and the challenges of my training was a lot of laughter and fun. One day the entire school went out to a water park. One of the rides there was an alpine slide, a long concrete and fiberglass track which ran in a series of curves and drops down a small mountain, down which one rode on a small sled on wheels. When we arrived at the top of the hill after a long ski lift, we ran across the platform and grabbed our sleds. I was wearing my sleepshades, since this was a school recreation event, and I could only hear the others whiz down the track into silence. Then I was off, nervously holding my brake at half-throttle. After two fun and uneventful rides, I decided to make the third one worth remembering. I shot down the slide, going as fast as I dared and careening around curves at a thrilling speed. Suddenly I felt the ground level beneath me, and I pushed the speed full-throttle. My friends turned around just in time to see me come shooting down the last stretch of track and collide into the all-too-solid safety cushion at the track’s end. For one breathtaking moment I was airborne. Then I landed once more on my sled, amid the others’ hysterical peals of laughter.
The climax of my training came during my last week at the center, when I was given a drop-off. The drop-off, to me, is really a symbol of the entire BLIND, Inc., philosophy, a philosophy which says that students should be placed in lifelike situations where they learn problem-solving skills, build confidence, and discover new blindness techniques, also known as the “structured-discovery method.” BLIND, Inc., does not believe in making things artificially easy for its students; instead it gives them a wide base of practical knowledge and experiences that they will draw upon for the rest of their lives.
Thus one morning I found myself standing on an unknown street corner in Minneapolis. I was allowed only one question to get me back to the school, and it could not be, “Where am I?” or “What street is this?” Quickly I began to walk back towards the nearest busy street and located a bus stop. When the bus arrived, I rode it for a short time, figured out where I was and walked the rest of the way back to the center.
Still buoyed by the extra confidence which this success gave me, I left the center at the end of the week, but I did not leave as the same person who had arrived. I carried away with me a host of new skills. From not knowing how to cross an intersection, I had progressed to my first drop-off. From knowing nothing of computers, I had mastered the basics of Word and been introduced to the Web. Finally, I had discovered my love for woodworking, improved my Braille speed, and learned new cooking techniques.
Supporting me in these new skills was a valuable network of friends and instructors. Such resources should not be underestimated since difficulty and discouragement do not cease after graduation from a NFB center. As I discovered, it is all too easy to begin to slowly let go of one’s independence without the support and challenge of others.
By the time I left the center, my confidence and freedom had been transformed. This time, when my plane landed, I walked alone from the gate to baggage claim to meet my parents. I carried with me a new zest for the unknown and the challenging. Even my perception of myself as a person who is blind had changed. The burdening belief that my blindness was a weakness was gone, replaced by a healthy knowledge of my ability and independence. Finally, I left the center with the living knowledge that whatever my dreams are, whatever God’s calling is upon my life, I can pursue those dreams and that calling unhindered by my blindness.

Saving Money for NFB-NEWSLINE®
by David Meyer

Editor’s Note: The following article appeared in the Braille Examiner, a publication of the National Federation of the Blind of Illinois. It has been edited for use in Ohio. Here it is:

Those who have used NFB-NEWSLINE consistently over the past several months have probably noticed an announcement from time to time asking us to help minimize NEWSLINE's phone bill.
It has always been a good idea to help the Federation by using local numbers or certain long-distance numbers to call NEWSLINE. But it is especially important for us to do so at this time. For several years the National Federation of the Blind was able to secure federal funds which were applied to the payment of telecommunications costs. These earmarked funds were never a single legislative item. Rather they came in the form of riders to other legislation which passed in Congress. This did not occur in 2006. Consequently, this year no federal money is available to assist the Federation in the payment of the telecommunications costs associated with NEWSLINE.
How can you help the Federation hold down expenses? The easiest way to assist us in this matter is to use a local NEWSLINE number. Many area codes have a phone number which can be used to call NEWSLINE. For example, the NEWSLINE local phone number in the 614 area code, which serves Franklin County, is 448-1673. If you want to learn your local NEWSLINE number, assuming that you have one, call the National Federation of the Blind toll-free at (866) 504-7300. The national office will provide your local number as long as there is one in your area. If you do not have a local number, you can dial the toll-free number, (888) 882-1629, to access NEWSLINE.
If your primary telephone is a cellular phone or if you use a cellular phone to call NEWSLINE, your charges will always be the same, regardless of the telephone number you use. Cellular plans provide a specific amount of time you can use your phone each month. For example, a person may pay $50 a month for 500 minutes that can be used any time to call anywhere. If you use a cellular phone to call a toll-free number and talk for ten minutes, you are charged for ten minutes of telephone time, just as you would be if you called a local number or a friend who lives across the country. We encourage you to use (614) 448-1673, which will cost the Federation only the insignificant flat rate of any local call. You may use your cellular phone to dial this number from anywhere in the United States, and your charges will remain the same as they are from your local area code. Moreover, if your package allows you to make calls free after 9:00 p.m. and on weekends, calling the 614 NEWSLINE number during those hours will be inexpensive to the NFB and cost you nothing.
If you have a telephone package for your landline that permits you to make an unlimited number of long-distance calls at no charge and you do not have a local number to call NEWSLINE, you should also use the 614 number. If you already have or soon get a local NEWSLINE number, you may find it faster to use that number so that you do not have to dial an area code.
If you are a regular user of NFB-NEWSLINE, you can look forward to many new and exciting advances such as new newspapers, television listings, and more. If you have yet to use NFB-NEWSLINE, call 1-866-391-0841 to sign up for the service. We will be glad to take your application over the phone. If you have a computer and would like to sign up online, you can do it by clicking on www.nfbohio.org or www.nfb.org. Give NEWSLINE a try—you'll like it.

Ohio Convention Just Around the Corner
by Mary Pool

Editor’s Note: Mary Pool chairs the Convention Committee. Here is what she has to say about our upcoming state convention in November:

Spring is finally here, and I am already looking forward to the summer and the national convention in Atlanta. But my excitement is also building for the fall and our state convention in Cincinnati. Let me put your mind at rest. I am not sitting around wishing my life away. I am far too busy for that. But I do get excited about our conventions, and this year’s state convention is going to be a good one.
We will be at the Holiday Inn Eastgate just outside of Cincinnati. Many of you will remember that we were there in 2000 for our joint convention with the Kentucky affiliate. This year the convention will take place from November 2 to 4 at the Holiday Inn Eastgate, 4501 Eastgate Boulevard, Cincinnati, OH 45245.
Our room rates are $67 a night plus tax. You can make your reservations by calling Intercontinental Hotel reservations at (800) 465-4329 or our hotel directly (513) 752-4400. I urge you to contact the hotel directly if at all possible.
Here are some important things to remember when planning for the convention. The board of directors will meet on Friday morning and not Thursday night this year, though, if you are planning to attend that meeting, you had better plan to come in Thursday night unless you live in Cincinnati. Our block of rooms will be released after October 17. You cannot be guaranteed our excellent room rate after that date. Please do not wait until after our block has been released to make your reservations. Inevitably one or two people do this each year, expecting someone to rescue them. Please don’t make me have to deal with that this year.
We offer an opportunity to preregister for the convention because it makes life easier when having to provide the hotel with meal counts and talk with them about setup. Therefore we provide you with a little savings for preregistering. Again I urge you to take seriously the deadline for preregistering that will be announced in the next newsletter. We are often asked to give someone the discounts because they really intended to get their registration materials in by the deadline, but they just couldn’t get their act together. We give everyone plenty of time, so such requests fall on deaf ears.
A much more complete article about the state convention will appear in the next issue of the newsletter. I will begin working on this shortly after coming back from our national convention in Atlanta where I hope to see many of you. I look forward to seeing many more of you in Cincinnati this fall.

Ohio Mentoring Project
by Deborah Kendrick

Editor’s Note: Deborah Kendrick is a member of the board of directors of the National Federation of the Blind of Ohio. She is also the coordinator of the new and exciting mentoring project that the affiliate has taken on. Here is what she has to say about this project:<\I>

The mother of a blind child once told me that her little girl suddenly stopped playing with her doll one day to ask, “Can blind girls be mommies?” We arranged for her to visit with me, a mother who is blind, and my three wonderful children. But the poignancy of that moment still grips my heart.
Blind girls can indeed be mommies, and blind boys can be daddies. Blind children can, in fact, grow up to be successful in just about any pursuit that their sighted siblings can. But when you are a young blind person and you have never known any successful blind adults, the bright and possible future is much more difficult to imagine.
In 2004, with a grant from the U.S. Department of Education, the National Center on Mentoring Excellence was established as part of NFB’s Jernigan Institute. Demonstration mentoring projects were begun in two states, Louisiana and Nebraska, and now four more states are repeating the project. Those four states are Georgia, Texas, Utah, and Ohio.
The purpose of the Ohio Mentoring Project is to raise the bar of expectations for blind youth and to show them, through friendship and example, that all goals are possible. We are looking for blind adults who can serve as successful role models and who are willing to commit the time and energy to launch a young blind person on the path to success.
The project will run for two years. Mentors will keep in touch with mentees via email, telephone, instant message, or whatever way is convenient for both, with at least one shared activity per month. What each pair does will be determined by the interests that have matched them in the first place. Maybe you’ll bake cookies or go shopping or build a robot. Maybe you’ll go rock climbing or bowling or go to a movie.
All mentors and mentees will attend a training weekend and will share in some activities planned for the entire group. We need your help in finding the best role models to serve as mentors and the young people who will benefit most from a mentoring relationship.
One little girl wondered aloud if blind girls could be mommies. Other young blind people are wondering all sorts of things—can I go to college? get a job? participate in sports? The friendship and encouragement of someone who’s been there can change a life and help change what it means to be blind.
If you or someone you know is interested in sharing in the fun as either mentor or mentee, contact Deborah Kendrick, state coordinator, at (513) 321-2232 or toll free (888) 778-5114, or by email at dkkendrick@earthlink.net. To read more about the mentoring program or fill out an application online, go to .

Federationists Busy in Congress and State Capital
by Eric Duffy

Many of us began contacting our congressional offices in early January to schedule appointments for the Washington Seminar. This year thirteen Ohioans were on Capitol Hill. We were well prepared and got a good reception generally. We also met the new members of the Ohio congressional delegation. We took three legislative initiatives to the 110th Congress. Although they received most of our focus, they are not the only issues we discussed, nor are they the only issues of concern to the organized blind in Congress this year. We asked Congress to require higher-education textbook publishers to produce electronic editions for blind students in an accessible standard format. When considering amendments to the Help America Vote Act, (HAVA), we reminded members of Congress to protect the right of blind citizens to vote independently and in private. Among other things, enacted legislation should assure blind voters access to the entire voting system, including any mechanism providing independent verification. Finally, we urged Congress to amend Title II of the Social Security Act to mandate a schedule of increases in the level of earnings allowed for blind individuals before applying a work penalty. See the March issue of the Braille Monitor for the complete fact sheets and legislative agenda. We must now work in Congress to save library services for the blind. In 1931 Congress passed the Pratt-Smoot Act, which authorized the distribution of books to blind and physically handicapped persons in the United States through what is now known as the National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped of the Library of Congress (NLS). Talking Books began to be produced in 1934 and were originally recorded on phonograph records; cassette books were produced beginning in 1971. Today recorded books and the equipment to play them are distributed through a network of cooperating libraries throughout the country. Books on all subjects and representing all literary genres, as well as a selection of popular magazines, are available to NLS patrons. From its inception the Talking Book program has always used the most cost-effective, accessible technology, and it has always protected the rights of copyright holders. The conversion to digital media now planned by NLS will be only the third change in media that Talking Books have undergone in seventy-three years. Currently the service uses analog cassette tapes that are now obsolete and must be replaced. The antiquated cassette-tape technology must be replaced in phases by state-of-the-art digital technology. Since 1990 NLS has been working on a plan to transition from analog to the most appropriate digital technology. NLS staff recognized that cassette tapes would become obsolete, and a new medium for delivery of Talking Books would be needed that would last for at least a generation. For this reason NLS began a deliberate, detailed, and rigorous process to identify the form that Talking Books would take in the twenty-first century. NLS considered all potential digital technologies for the delivery of Talking Books and conducted extensive user testing to ensure that patrons of all ages and degrees of technological prowess, including elderly and newly blind individuals who constitute the largest segment of the NLS user population, could operate the new equipment to play the books. Wisely the service looked beyond the audio CD, which is now nearing the end of its cycle of innovation. In addition to its limited life cycle, CD players have moving parts, which means that they would require considerably more maintenance than other technologies, thereby increasing the cost. Flash memory, which was a new technology at the time NLS began the process of designing the next generation of Talking Books and players, is now ubiquitous and inexpensive, has more storage capacity than CDs, and has no moving parts. Recently, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) has criticized NLS for failing to consider whether off-the-shelf iPod or CD technology might be used to distribute and play Talking Books as a cost-saving measure. While some commercial audio players are available that rely on flash memory, these devices are not designed with blind persons in mind; none of them can be used independently by a blind person because they feature screens and complex visual menus for issuing commands. Moreover, commercial audio devices typically have tiny controls that cannot be manipulated by someone with a physical handicap. By contrast, the digital Talking Book players that have been specially designed for the NLS program for its blind and physically handicapped readers have large, tactually distinct controls, audio menus, and other features that allow them to be operated easily by all NLS patrons. In addition, the specially designed flash memory cartridges that contain the Talking Books are able to hold a Braille label identifying the book’s title and can be easily manipulated by people with dexterity problems, unlike the tiny memory cards used in commercial audio players. Finally, digital files containing NLS Talking Books are encrypted in order to make them unplayable by commercial devices in order to comply with the legal requirement that Talking Books be distributed in a specialized format to protect copyrights. The Legislative Branch Appropriations request from NLS for fiscal year 2008 seeks $19.1 million, in addition to the service’s normal budget of $55.7 million, to begin the conversion to digital technology. An additional $19.1 million will be required in each of the subsequent three fiscal years to complete the conversion. Congress should fully fund the NLS request so that the conversion to digital technology for the Talking Book program can proceed as planned. The service provided by NLS is invaluable to hundreds of thousands of blind Americans—it is our only library, our only bookstore, our only magazine stand. The current analog cassette players are no longer available and therefore must be replaced in order for the Talking Book program to remain viable. All of the GAO concerns either are unfounded or have been addressed by NLS, which has kept blind Americans fully informed over the past decade about the development of the Digital Talking Book and has tested the usability of the new Talking Books and players with groups of patrons across the nation. Fully funding the conversion to digital Talking-Book technology is the highest priority of blind Americans for the 110th Congress, because this conversion must be accomplished in order for the Talking Book program to continue.
It is critical that you contact an appropriations staffer for your member of Congress and both Senators to let them know how important this program is to the blind. The conversion has been well thought out, and all of the money requested is necessary.
I had the opportunity to testify in support of the state budget for Ohio’s regional libraries for the blind. The libraries received flat funding for the next two years. Once again I talked about the need for the Web sites and to be accessible. I reminded the subcommittee that this problem was brought to their attention two years ago. State Library director JO Budler has indicated that this problem will be addressed this year. Shortly after the hearing Director Budler sent a Braille letter thanking me for our testimony. It goes without saying that rehabilitation services in the state of Ohio are not perfect. The story that Sarah Leon tells elsewhere in this newsletter is a fine illustration of that. She and others should not have to jump through hoops, file appeals, or even request a waiver to get the training that will meet her needs. There are other problems that are well known to those of us who have worked in the field of blindness for any length of time, but the concerns that we can now identify are mild compared to what we will see if the state budget passes in its current form. The Strickland Administration flat-funded the Ohio Rehabilitation Services Commission (ORSC) in the upcoming budget. At first glance this might not seem like a bad thing, but it means that ORSC will have to leave millions of dollars of federal funding in Washington because it does not have enough state money available to draw down the allocated federal funds into the state. Ohio must come up with one dollar for just under every $4 that the Federal Government is prepared to spend for rehabilitation services. So for every $1 that the state does not invest in rehabilitation services, we automatically lose almost $4. As the budget now stands, the agency will also face maintenance of effort penalty. To avoid such a penalty, ORSC must spend at least the same amount on rehabilitation services in the next two years as it did in the previous two. One is tempted to ask, what’s the problem? If ORSC received flat funding, they should have the same amount of money in the next budget as they now have. Because ORSC had some money in reserve, it was able to draw down every federal dollar available during the last two years. One could conclude that ORSC has brought down the maintenance of effort penalty on itself. Yes, the agency could have sent money back to Washington; it could have fallen short during the current budget cycle, denying services to consumers. But what would have been the benefit? The budget has now passed the House with ORSC $6.5 million short of what it needs. Money that was used to serve the older blind in previous budgets has been put into case service dollars by the Strickland Administration, which will leave the older blind even further out in the cold—without services and without equipment. What can you do about this distressing situation? Call your state senator and let him or her know that rehabilitation services are important to you. Let him or her know that older, newly blind people will suffer most in the proposed budget. Tell your story about how you have benefited from rehabilitation services. Contact the Governor’s office with the same message. Let everyone know that in your opinion the ORSC budget must be increased by $6.5 million.

More than Meets the Eyes and Ears Lecturer Speaks about Abilities of the Visually Impaired
by Karen Brosz

Editor’s Note: The following article about First Vice President J. W. Smith appeared in the Keene State College (KSC) Equinox on Thursday, March 29, 2007. Here it is:

J. Webster Smith, an associate professor at Ohio University, has been blind since the age of three. He spoke to KSC students and faculty Wednesday, March 21. His presentation was on how to communicate with the visually impaired. Smith became legally blind at the age of three, and since then he has become an associate professor at Ohio University, where he has been teaching since 1999. "People who are blind or visually impaired are people like you [those with sight] in every respect," he said. "They are just people whose eyes and ears work differently."
Throughout the years Smith has received several teaching awards, including the Educator of the Year Award from the National Federation of the Blind, and has coauthored and single authored books about communication and campaigns. Smith has also taught interviewing, parliamentary procedure, and stress management workshops. At KSC Smith hoped his speech would raise awareness and aid students in gaining knowledge of themselves and others. "Whatever we can do to broaden knowledge is something to be gained," he said.
"More people should have been there, considering the number of visually impaired individuals on campus," said junior Michael Phaneuf. "I really had no idea what to expect going into this, but he quickly brought humor and gave a great speech. It's definitely opened my eyes." According to Smith, TABs, temporarily able-bodied, tend to make assumptions about those who are visually impaired. Smith noted this when he sensed an individual following him while he was walking on a college campus. Multiple times he recalls stopping, yet the individual too would stop. After two more stops Smith said, he turned and asked, "Can I help you?"
The individual replied, "I don't want to stop you while you're counting steps."
"Most blind people don't count steps anymore, but some do," said Smith. "The intention (of TABs) most times is to be helpful," he said. "But I want you to know that I am the expert on blindness when it comes to me. If I really need to be helped, I'll ask you.” Another assumption Smith shared was the idea of a disability spreading if a TAB came into contact with an individual who was visually impaired. “They think it's going to rub off like the plague,” he said. Yet Smith stressed that those who are visually impaired have problems and bad days just as a TAB does. "People with disabilities are just as irritable and just as cranky (as TABs can be)," he said. But TABs are not only to blame, Smith stated. Some visually impaired individuals do not feel they have the right to be with a TAB. Smith said, "You've got to make yourself friendly to have friends. I know it goes both ways."
"It's just interesting," said Marlee Leveille, R.O.C.K.S. assistant coordinator. "I feel like I'm always looking to talk to blind students; however, instead I rarely talk to them."
"I can't tell you how much disrespect a person with disabilities gets in a week," said Smith. When a group of TABS and visually impaired students are talking together, Smith said that the visually impaired or handicap student is talked about as if he or she wasn't there, or others speak for them. Smith said questions such as "What does he want?" or "What did she say?" frequently come up, yet he assured the audience that the individual can speak for him- or herself. "So don't do it," he said. "Just because my eyes don't work doesn't mean that the rest of me doesn't work," he said. According to Smith, when a child sees some kind of visible, obvious disability, such as a hook vs. hand, the child is intrigued. Smith said he believes it is the parents who do not allow their children to approach individuals and ask them about their disability for fear of embarrassing them. Smith referred to this as the "shush factor." "But most individuals [with disabilities] would much rather talk about it," said Smith. "It's us adults who freak out about it." By not talking to the person with the disability, Smith stated, parents were teaching their children to avoid those with disabilities. Between speaking with KSC faculty and students, Smith spent some time with the visually impaired students. According to sophomore Andrew Harmon, Smith also shared how he teaches communications and speech as well as giving lectures.
"He was pretty nice to talk to," said Harmon. "He's a great guy, really great guy." As a former student of Smith's at Ohio University, Maria Beatriz Torres, an associate professor of communication, decided to invite him to speak at Keene. "I was a student at Ohio University. [Smith] happened to be a professor there. Life takes so many turns. My partner, second husband, became legally blind, and the first thing I thought was I needed help, and [Smith] guided us," said Torres. "He gave us resources, functions, and normalcy." At the end of his lecture two questions were raised as to how he became comfortable with public speaking.
"I'm very comfortable in this room full of sighted people," said Smith. "I came from a family of speakers and preachers.” During Smith's childhood, towards the age of ten, Smith said he often went into the bathroom and preached to himself in the mirror. "I loved to hear myself talk," he said.
Smith credits his achievements and talent of public speaking to his faith in God, musical experience, and the way his grandparents raised him--requiring him to do everything his TAB brother did. "I had chores, had to clean and wash the dishes, yet they never made me cook," said Smith. After meeting individuals from disability services, human resources, faculty in communications, visually impaired students and TABs, Smith shared his appreciation for the effective and generally concerned individuals working with those who have disabilities. "They are very proactive, which is refreshing," he said. "I wish I saw more of this at home." However, if Smith was granted one wish, he knows exactly what he'd wish for. "I would like to have a twenty-four-hour period to see what life looks like," said Smith. "I cannot fathom what you talk about with grass and light."

Buckeye Briefs

Richard Payne chairs the National Federation of the Blind of Ohio’s Membership Committee. He is energetic and committed to building the affiliate. Here is what he has to say on this topic:

Here we are almost at the middle of the year, and I wonder how well the affiliate is doing. We must start to think seriously about how to build the organization. If you have not thought about it lately, you should. I am very interested in growing the membership.
After becoming the chair of the Membership Committee, I decided to step back and look at the NFB of Ohio as a whole. I sent a brief survey out that gave me more of an idea of just how much work we have to do. Please do not misunderstand me; I am not finding fault with anyone in the organization. Only three surveys were returned, and I found little interest in developing ways to address the problems facing us. This could say a little or a lot. You figure it out.
We are all guilty of skipping the presidential release from time to time—that doesn’t bother me—but some chapters seem to be ignoring it altogether. A few chapters are not holding regular meetings. No chapter can grow without meeting regularly in an announced location.
No one person can revitalize this movement in Ohio. It will take all of us working together. I am going to offer some ideas for things that you can do in your chapter over the next several issues of this newsletter. I won’t think of everything, and I would be happy for you to share your ideas as well. Here are my suggestions for this issue: 1. Read a Kernel Book story each month and discuss key themes.
2. Incorporate a how-do-I? segment into the agenda so that members can share tips for getting things done.
3. Have regular times for sharing why-I-am-a-Federationist stories.
4. Host employment panels in which chapter members share strategies for preparing for successful careers, getting hired, and becoming employees.
5. Bring in speakers to discuss topics that affect blind people.

Braille Readers are Leaders Reportz

Crystal McClain, president of the Ohio Parents Division, prepared the following report about this year’s very successful contest:

We kicked off our Braille Readers Are Leaders (BRAL) activities with an assembly at the Ohio State School for the Blind (OSSB) in October. We got the kids very excited about reading. We even had a visit from Louis Braille himself. Each month we had a planned activity to support BRAL. In October there was a poster/jingle contest. In November we had a contest to see which class could get the highest participation. In December we awarded cash prizes to the kids in each grade with the highest number of pages read at that point. In January we had a birthday party for Louis Braille. The school’s record shows a total of twenty-four kids were involved and read a total of 26,509 Braille pages. NFB records show twenty-six OSSB participants this year, and the astounding part is that we had seven winners in various categories: Aaron Lynch, Macy McClain, Leeann Nichols, Mark Puzon, Autumn Radcliff, Katie Robinson, and Hannah Siemer. I think this is great! Last year we had a mere fourteen participants. We are going to award $100 to each of two teachers for their achievements in the contest. The school would like to use the $200 to buy either Braille books or games for the classrooms. All the elementary classes had 100% participation either in Braille reading or in the print reading which the PTSO sponsored.

We all know the value of good Braille reading skills. Crystal deserves special thanks for the hard work she put into making this contest such a success this year.

This year art students at Oberlin High School decided to paint the portraits of distinguished Oberlinians past and present. The resulting banners are now hung from lamp standards in the downtown area, and a booklet briefly listing the credentials of each of these citizens has been prepared. One of those so honored was Barbara Pierce. Her portrait hangs outside the Oberlin Inn at the central intersection of the town.

Paul Dressell and the Cincinnati Chapter report as follows:
Congratulations to Kyle Conley, who performed the National Anthem at the Cincinnati Reds’ game on Tuesday, May 8.
Those who read Talking Book Topics or Braille Book Review know that the Digital Talking Book machine will be distributed beginning in 2008, but those who attended the April 26 meeting of the Cincinnati chapter were able to learn about its many wonderful features in 2007. Deborah Kendrick is one of 100 testers throughout the United States. She used a Victor Reader modified by Humanware, which had all of the features of the Digital Talking Book Machine such as crystal-clear sound, the ability to insert bookmarks, and different levels that allowed readers to skip forward or  backward by phrases, paragraphs, or chapters. We will have a difficult time exercising patience for the release of these machines. Judy Cook had successful knee-replacement surgery on April 3 and is now back home. Not only did Judy nimbly navigate her apartment, but she met Bernie and me outside and piloted us to her apartment. She hopes to return to work soon; and as her substitute said, "She is smoothin' and groovin' and lookin' good.” Our annual chapter picnic will be June 3 at Woodpecker Woods in Winton Woods Park from 2 PM to 9 PM. For more information call Sheri Albers at (513) 886-8697 or Paul Dressell at (513) 481-7662.

We are delighted to report that Sarah Leon has been given full funding to attend BLIND, Incorporated, again this summer. If you attended the convention last fall, you will remember her moving report of getting to BLIND last summer. A version of that report appears in this issue of the newsletter. Sarah will be able to take up where she left off in her instruction last year. As hard as she works, she should be able to finish her preparation for college during these weeks of demanding work and challenging recreation. Congratulations to Sarah and thank you to BSVI and particularly Sarah’s counselor for understanding the importance of completing what was so ably begun last year.

Activities Calendar

June 1 Deadline for 2007 NFB-O scholarship applications

June 15-17 Family Camping Weekend

June 30-July 6 National Federation of the Blind convention, Atlanta

July 3 March for Independence, Atlanta

August 15 Deadline for submitting materials for Fall Newsletter

September 14 Deadline for Gavel Award reports and award nominations

September 15 State board meeting

September 21-23 Parents Division Fall Weekend

October 1-31 Meet the Blind Month

October 15 White Cane Safety Day

October 17 Hotel will release convention guest rooms

October 27 Deadline for submitting corrected chapter lists and dues without penalty

November 2-4 NFB-O convention, Cincinnati

NFB-NEWSLINE® local numbers to call for dial-up connection:

Greater Cincinnati area, (513) 297-1521
Cleveland, (216) 453-2090
Akron, (330) 247-1241
Canton, (330) 409-1900
Columbus, (614) 448-1673

For more information about NFB-NEWSLINE or to receive support, call (866) 391-0841.
Back to Home Page